Former Aviation Minister Femi Fani-Kayode has told the Federal High Court in Abuja how his estranged wife Precious Chikwendu denied his kids breast milk to preserve her shape.
The politician who made the revelation on Wednesday while praying to the court to dismiss the N800 million suit that was instituted against him by the mother of his four sons, Precious Chikwendu.
Fani-Kayode told the court that his ex-wife deprived his children breast milk on the account of the need to preserve her body shape, “coupled with a contrived medical condition which she claimed would not permit her to breast-feed them.”
In a 23-paragraphed affidavit he personally deposed to in opposition to the suit, FFK said that it was not true that the applicant (Ms. Chikwendu) was violently separated from the four children they had together.
He told the court that rather, “she elected to leave her matrimonial home and consciously abandon the children, in order to optimise without restraints, her extra-marital and inordinate sexual escapades.”
READ ALSO: Precious Chikwendu files petition before Senate against ex-hubby Fani-Kayode
Continuing, he said: “As a fact, it is not surprising that Ms. Precious Chikwendu is capable of such reckless abandonment, because: whilst she was with me in the house as fore described, she employed 12 in-house nannies to cater for the children, excluding supervisors and nurses who equally attend to them.
“The Applicant did not at anytime extend maternal care to the children, for the reason that she had a medical condition which deprived her of any filial bond with them.
“She deprived the children of the natural sucks or breast milk, also on account of the need to preserve her body shape, coupled with a contrived medical condition which she claimed would not permit her to breast feed them.
“Despite the enormity of the Applicant’s brazen amoral acts, several advances had been made to her, in returning home or visiting the children, but she completely rebuffed all.
“In a recent letter which was written to her Solicitor handling the matrimonial case, his attention was drawn to the fact that there has been no time that the Applicant was deprived physical access to her children, in as much as she has been speaking to them on phone and doing video calls with them.
“The Applicant only plays the victim and cries foul of deprivation of access or separation from her children, when indeed, she does not deeply desire to be with them,” he added.
Consequently, he urged the court to dismiss the suit for lacking in merit, as well as for constituting an abuse of judicial process.
